Re: [dev] stderr: unnecessary?

From: hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:03:52 +0000

Sometimes you don't want to read the errors.

On 6/11/10, Matthew Bauer <mjbauer95_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> No, I just don't understand why you need a stderr when you have a stdout.
> Couldn't you just print your error to stdout?
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Samuel Baldwin <recursive.forest_AT_gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/10 Matthew Bauer <mjbauer95_AT_gmail.com>:
>> > Does anyone else think that stderr shouldn't be used in Unix-like
>> systems?
>> > I think that it could be replaced by stdout.
>>
>> Have you ever used a unix pipe before?
>>
>> Wait, you have to be trolling.
>> --
>> Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
>>
>>
>
Received on Fri Jun 11 2010 - 04:03:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 11 2010 - 04:12:03 UTC