Re: [dev] stderr: unnecessary?

From: Mate Nagy <>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:38:29 +0200

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:03:27AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> My point was that that is false.
not only is it false, but a few months ago we were running an
application (with nsz) where on one computer about 10 processes mmapped
a 3.5GB file all at once, perfectly happily. (They were 64 bit computers
of course.)

the same thing also worked with just 2GB of physical ram (although it
was a bit of a strain, in production systems we used 8GB).

Received on Sat Jun 12 2010 - 05:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jun 12 2010 - 05:48:02 UTC