On 14 June 2010 00:16, David Tweed <david.tweed_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the issues to consider is that what computers are used for
> changes with time, and decisions that one may classify as "the
> suckless way of doing things" at one point in time may mean that it's
> not effectively useable in some future situations.
If the system is sufficiently modular it should be relatively future-proof.
cls
Received on Sun Jun 13 2010 - 23:38:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 13 2010 - 23:48:03 UTC