On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel <uriel_AT_berlinblue.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous <ake7zefe_AT_lavabit.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
>>> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
>>
>> Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art.
>> Unlicense[1] for software,
>
> While in principle I like the idea of the 'unlicense', its legal value
> is very questionable. For software and code sticking with the classic
> BSD/MIT/ISC licenses is a much better idea.
>
> I personally 'dual-license' my code as ISC and then release it to the
> public domain.
I kind of liked the license 20h was using in the past:
"Copy me if you can"
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Mon Jun 21 2010 - 16:53:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 21 2010 - 17:00:06 UTC