Re: [dev] picture

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel<uriel_AT_berlinblue.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous<ake7zefe_AT_lavabit.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA?
>>>>
>>>> Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art.
>>>> Unlicense[1] for software,
>>>
>>> While in principle I like the idea of the 'unlicense', its legal value
>>> is very questionable. For software and code sticking with the classic
>>> BSD/MIT/ISC licenses is a much better idea.
>>>
>>> I personally 'dual-license' my code as ISC and then release it to the
>>> public domain.
>>
>> I kind of liked the license 20h was using in the past:
>>
>> "Copy me if you can"
>
> it is not a license. I am pretending that everyone's considering
> my work public domain. It is a post-license. Because of a lawyer,
> who analyzed this[0], regarding Geomyidae, I changed all maybe
> useful code to MIT/X.
> MIT/X is the best balance between "Keep respect to me." and "Kim-
> Jong Uriel", yes, build your physical package with it.".

Hahaha, this made my day, added it to the cat-v fortunes file:

http://fortunes.cat-v.org/cat-v/

uriel

> Sincerely,
>
> Christoph
>
> [0]
> http://blog.iusmentis.com/2008/09/29/geomyidae-publiek-domein-behalve-als-u-niet-netjes-handelt/
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 22 2010 - 05:16:58 UTC