Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible

From: Simon Gomizelj <simongmzlj_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:49:55 -0400

Hello. I've been a long time reader but never posted here before.

This might be of some interest. I've tackled this issue before with my own
version of the pertag patch that dynamically allocates memory. This patch
also adds per tag defaults. Any comments and criticisms appreciated.

text/x-patch attachment: pertag.diff

Received on Wed Jul 07 2010 - 22:49:55 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Antle: "Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible"
Previous message: Donald Allen: "Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible"
In reply to: Donald Allen: "Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible"
Next in thread: Andrew Antle: "Re: [dev] pertag and bstack patches to dwm incompatible"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 07 2010 - 23:00:04 CEST