On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:11:05AM +0100, Rob wrote:
>On 27 July 2010 00:53, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm> wrote:
>...
>> An idea crossed my mind, I don't know if it's worth anything. I thought of
>> adding a pair of fields to dwm's window-matching array to match any X
>> property set on a window. I don't know how the typing would work, perhaps it
>> could involve a pointer to a union? Also it could be a nuisance to those
>> with long window-matching lists.
>
>Crossed my mind too, but I would have no use of it and flexible arrays
>inside structures are a pain, so I didn't bother.
>If you have any ideas, I'd be interested, though, purely implementation-wise.
Not so much. There's quite easy if you allow C99, anyway.
typedef struct {
char *class;
char *regex;
int ord;
} Prop;
struct {
char *Rule;
RuleFn fn;
RuleArg arg;
} rules[] = {
{ (Rule[]){ {"WM_CLASS", "foo", 1}, {"WM_NAME", "bar"}, {0}},
retag, { .s = "baz" } },
};
Or something to that effect. Although a macro to wrap up the
simple cases would probably help.
-- Kris Maglione It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it. --Upton SinclairReceived on Tue Jul 27 2010 - 02:35:47 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 27 2010 - 02:48:01 CEST