> For timestamps that must be both human-readable and machine-readable, I
> just told you: YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss-tz:tz (the fractional-second
> timezone should be optional). (That paragraph wasn't entirely a
> joke.)
Sorry, I misinterpreted what you wrote (“last standard that we’ll ever
need” – the meaning of that and the rest of that paragraph did
actually get swapped around in my head. ;)
I did some research about different formats when working on some other
calendar project this spring, and I arrived at the conclusion that all
should switch to ISO 8601. But I feel that it’s more sane than not to
drop the number of seconds from flo’s output, since it will always be
00.
Alexander
Received on Mon Aug 16 2010 - 00:08:06 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 16 2010 - 00:12:02 CEST