Re: [dev] libdraw development

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:48:15 +0100

On Friday, September 3, 2010, Anselm R Garbe <> wrote:
> Plan 9's libdraw is very different to the libdraw we are discussing.
> libdraw of dmenu/dwm is intended to be used for different backends,
> not just xlib, hence having libxdraw would be misleading. If we think
> about a better name, what about libdc? There is one already, what a
> surprise, but porbably the conflict here would be less intense. Since
> all functions are dc_ prefixed, libdc makes sense.

Indeed, I think this was one of my suggestions when we were discussing
it in-channel (along with 'libddraw').

Received on Fri Sep 03 2010 - 10:48:15 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 03 2010 - 11:00:04 CEST