Hello,
Why not just split it, like everybody else does? Plus, other compilers
possibly don't support it. I't quite a convention for libraries, as far as I
know. Instead, you make it work only with gcc, something you usually complain
about as big and sucky ____ that has more fuss than necessary because of GNU
and ponies. How is that consistent? Does breaking conventions for static
libraries really make it suckless? Isn't portability one of the goals?
Kind regards,
Moritz
Received on Mon Sep 06 2010 - 22:10:16 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 06 2010 - 22:12:02 CEST