* Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de> [2010-09-30 15:58]:
> Excerpts from stanio's message of Thu Sep 30 15:19:33 +0200 2010:
> > * Jordi Marine <jordimarine_AT_gmail.com> [2010-09-30 15:08]:
> > > readable XML?
> > Valid statement.
> > He didn't say human readable.
> XML fetishists (university) claim that one of it's best features is
That was the point.
bad smartass joke, I know.
Some others claim interoperability of tool A with tool B, because A can
export to XML, and B can read XML. I like this. It makes me hope that I can
have a conversation with a Chinese guy just because we both can speak and
> > as readable as tar.gz is.
> with the correct reader, tar.gz is easier to read than XML.
With the correct reader everything is exactly as readable as everything
else with it's correct reader.
-- stanio_Received on Thu Sep 30 2010 - 16:10:24 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 30 2010 - 16:12:03 CEST