Re: [dev] sta.li progress

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:08:24AM +0100, Jens Staal wrote:
> For anyone interested in playing around with compiling stuff with
> bionic, I just made an AUR for it:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44629
>
> Would be cool if it started to be used :)

Jens, excellent! I will have a look into it!

Cheers,
        Anselm

> 2010/10/13 Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>:
> > Anyone volunteering to create an mkfile for bionic, this jam looks
> > like jam and should be avoided.
> > I volunteer to review it and to bring it in good shape.
> >
> > -Anselm
> >
> > On 13 October 2010 14:34, Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have no idea what the jam stuff is but I found this after some googling too
> >>
> >> https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/framework/repository/revisions/10202/entry/external/source/meterpreter/source/bionic/libc/Jamfile
> >>
> >> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.lists_AT_gmail.com>:
> >>> Excellent! I've been searching for something like this. I'll check it out.
> >>>
> >>> On 13 October 2010 08:29, Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Are those issues already solved by
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/attachments/433/get_bionic_working.diff
> >>>>
> >>>> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.lists_AT_gmail.com>:
> >>>>> On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wtivy1_AT_my.bcit.ca> wrote:
> >>>>>>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files,
> >>>>>>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution
> >>>>>>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to
> >>>>>>>wherever its looking now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all,
> >>>>>> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some
> >>>>>> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack
> >>>>>> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new
> >>>>>> makefile.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header
> >>>>> files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been mentioned
> >>>>>> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post
> >>>>>> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For
> >>>>>> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually
> >>>>>> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 2010 - 11:39:53 CET