[dev] Re: Version control for Sta.li

> I just found a version control system that I hadn't heard of and might work well for Stali: Fossil. It's by the author of SQLite

Sounds like more than reason enough to avoid it like the plague that SQLite is.

> It also serves as its own web server (but can be used with CGI as well) that provides repository browsing, issue tracking, and a wiki.

The emacs of scms? This is well beyond scary.

uriel

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bill Burdick <bill.burdick_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Trying to get Anselm's attention -- do you know if he is still working on
> Stali?
> Bill Burdick
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill Burdick <bill.burdick_AT_gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:31 PM
> Subject: Version control for Sta.li
> To: anselm_AT_garbe.us
>
>
> I'm a fan of Stali and I just found a version control system that I hadn't
> heard of and might work well for Stali: Fossil.  It's by the author of
> SQLite -- a single 800K executable that provides both client and server.  It
> also serves as its own web server (but can be used with CGI as well) that
> provides repository browsing, issue tracking, and a wiki.
> Here's my listing from ldd:
> linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00880000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0041f000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x004e4000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x001aa000)
> It seems fairly feature-compatible with Mercurial/Git (nothing like Git's
> submodule support at this point, from what I can tell).  Here's the
> link: http://www.fossil-scm.org
>
> Bill Burdick
>
Received on Mon Mar 21 2011 - 04:01:48 CET