Re: [dev] [st] bold as bright (again)

On 01.04.2011 16:28, pancake wrote:
> On 04/01/11 15:51, Stefan Mark wrote:
>> On 01.04.2011 15:42, pancake wrote:
>>> http://lolcathost.org/b/stcolors.png
>>> http://lolcathost.org/b/stcolors2.png
>>>
>>> Both works for me
>>>
>> These work, the directory was missing.
>>
>> Anyway, the irssi display looks good to me. I have the default colors in
>> config.h, and see no difference between xterm and st.
>>
> oops. sorry
>
> i was using the old config.h
>
> with the new config.h i get irssi ok with and without the patch and it
> looks like xterm.
>
> So...can you give me any example/reason why apply this hack? (imho: bold
> is not bright),
> and programs missusing this concept should be fixed, and authors notified.
>
for example:
http://0mark.unserver.de/filez/htop.png

Most things are not that bad (text is not visible), but sometimes
annoying or dull looking. I could make more examples later.

All other Terminals i know off make bold to bold&bright, so most
programs are made for this.
Received on Fri Apr 01 2011 - 16:40:08 CEST