On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jan <keks_AT_unstable.nl> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:52:59 +0300, Le Tian <tianeast_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 5. restart
> looks alright, I don't know about the makepkg arguments. Why don't you
> just clone the hg and compile it? My binary is in $HOME/.local/bin, and
> that dir is in my path. Since my dwm-binary stores personal customizations
> (in your case, the font), I believe it is justified to put it somewhere in
> $HOME. Do you any good reason to choose abs over the official repo?
>
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Can't really help you on this one, sorry.
>
> -keks
>
>
well I was following arch wiki, nothing more, I also tend to think that
using makepkg is safer, since then the installation is being handled with
pacman and can be easily updated. Maybe I should compile it right from
source? I shall try it since nothing else works, thanks
-- TianReceived on Sun Apr 03 2011 - 13:56:18 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 03 2011 - 14:00:05 CEST