Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL schema handlers (2) delete _SURF_GO xprop (3) close stdout sending XID

From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 22:31:18 +0000

Adam Strzelecki <ono_AT_java.pl> wrote:
> It is safer to remove this atom just after it is set in case we send some URL containing passwords or auth tokens
I'm confused as to the state between setting _SURF_GO and removing it.
It smells like a race condition to me, but then again I don't
understand X11 properties. I'd like a clarification as to how security
is kept in the meantime (between setting and removal of _SURF_GO).
Received on Sun Apr 10 2011 - 00:31:18 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 10 2011 - 00:36:02 CEST