> Security isn't kept. This seems like more of a prevention of accidental disclosure than real security. (And therefore pointless...?)
> As an example, with this patch applied, run the following:
> The output in the spy terminal is:
> _SURF_GO: not found
> _SURF_GO(UTF8_STRING) = 0x61, 0x73, 0x64, 0x66 == "asdf"
> _SURF_GO: not found
You're absolutely right, thanks for noticing that flaw in my patch. Do you have any idea if it is possible to set up some write-only atom in X11 or we would need something else like unix socket, to prevent some other party spying what URLs are sent to *surf*?
Cheers,
-- Adam StrzeleckiReceived on Mon Apr 11 2011 - 16:16:30 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 11 2011 - 16:24:02 CEST