Re: [musl] Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-09, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:23:18 +0200

Hi guys,

first of all, nice work Christian!

On 12 April 2011 00:45, pancake <> wrote:
> Slpm is probably much simpler than any ports system out there. It still needs some love..But it works for my use cases.
> I recommend you to take a look on it. :)
> I already packaged musl, tcc and other stuff in slpm

I don't see the point in a package _manager_ at all.

What I do see is to have something like ports or build scripts that
build/bootstrap the system and create binaries for future updating
purposes (or security fixes). My personal choice/preference for this
would be a ports system based on mk files -- some volunteers
contributed early steps in this direction already.

Ideally the system would be kept up to date using rsync or just git
pull, that's what I intend with (once I have more extra time).

Kind regards,
Received on Tue Apr 12 2011 - 11:23:18 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 12 2011 - 11:24:03 CEST