[dev] Re: [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 10:15:31 +0200

pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> writes:

> I would love to see gcc, clang, tcc or Go.. Else i dont see the point
> of distributing make, patch, git and similar.

We have gcc 4.5.3, but C only, because musl can't do C++ yet.
tcc should build, gcc 4.6 apparently works too, which would provide Go I
think? clang needs C++ bootstrapping first.

> An arm port would be great.

You port musl, and I'll have a look at the rest. ;-)

> Good job. It looks promising.


Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 10:15:31 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2011 - 10:24:02 CEST