Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick White <nick_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
> > And seriously, compare the code of netsurf and webkit-gtk
> > sometime.
>
> I don't understand why netsurf seems to require libxml at runtime.

I didn't know it did. Are you using a newish build?

> Is the framebuffer port still a redheaded stepchild? Has anyone
> moved to porting it to something that isn't gtk? I'd rather have
> lesstif or tk than gtk.

The framebuffer port doesn't look that wierd. I still dream
of writing a surf interface using netsurf's parsers
libraries, http://www.netsurf-browser.org/projects/hubbub/,
but unfortunately haven't been able to summon the time.

Others may be put off by the lack of javascript, but I am
heartened by it ;-)
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 16:02:40 CEST