Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Nick <>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:02:40 +0100

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick White <> wrote:
> > And seriously, compare the code of netsurf and webkit-gtk
> > sometime.
> I don't understand why netsurf seems to require libxml at runtime.

I didn't know it did. Are you using a newish build?

> Is the framebuffer port still a redheaded stepchild? Has anyone
> moved to porting it to something that isn't gtk? I'd rather have
> lesstif or tk than gtk.

The framebuffer port doesn't look that wierd. I still dream
of writing a surf interface using netsurf's parsers
but unfortunately haven't been able to summon the time.

Others may be put off by the lack of javascript, but I am
heartened by it ;-)
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 16:02:40 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2011 - 16:12:03 CEST