Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 16:19:25 +0200

Didnt knew netsurf. it looks fast. but...

1) keyboard support sucks (no way to change between tabs, and no way to
switch between text fields, links, ... with tab)

2) dependencies:
Depends On : libmng librsvg curl libglade lcms libjpeg>=7
libwapcaplet libcss

I don't get the point of not distributing netsurf as a library... it
would be great if this project was just producing a standalone library
and a simple client implementation.

3) where's the javascript? most modern websites works only with
javascript. there'r tons of libraries to run it.. maybe you will say:
"js sucks".. but the web is made of it, and you can't ignore it.

4) possibility to filter or ban ads? (custom js fun? custom css stuff?)

On 05/04/11 15:43, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick White<nick_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
>> I enjoyed the irony of this email.
> If there existed a patch for the webos email client to not do that
> shit, I would apply *so fast*
>
>> And seriously, compare the code of netsurf and webkit-gtk
>> sometime.
> I don't understand why netsurf seems to require libxml at runtime.
> Has anyone built it statically? Is the framebuffer port still a
> redheaded stepchild? Has anyone moved to porting it to something that
> isn't gtk? I'd rather have lesstif or tk than gtk.
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 16:19:25 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2011 - 16:24:02 CEST