Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Al Gest <himselfe_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Who's likely to behave more intelligently, a person who experiments
> and finds out what works and doesn't work for themselves and
> understands from experience why things work or don't work, or a person
> who religiously follows the preaching of some overcompensating
> jackass?

Specious question.

> flawed, you're just throwing fallacious remarks with the apparent aim
> of pressuring your opponent into submission.

I'm not responsible for your inferences.

> There are people in this world, like Theo de Raadt, who through their
> passion and frustration come across as assholes to the people at odds
> with them, but still provide a constructive argument, and then there
> are angry nerds who just come across as complete jackasses.

Then there are whiners.

> How you say something doesn't alter the substance of what you're
> saying, and it is the substance that provides merit. There is no
> substance in calling somebody stupid without explaining the why.

"Why" has been explained many times in the past on this very list.

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:08 PM, errno <errno_AT_cox.net> wrote:
> So what now? Do we exchange gps coordinates so we can duke it
> out physically, you lizard brained, pencil-necked fuckwad. That'll
> prove who's right about... transparent fucking terminals of all things.

Didn't take you long to shift into internet tough guy mode, eh?

> I got a better idea. How about if you just take your pigheaded antisocial
> misgivings and shuv them up your gaping asshole along with that brainfull
> of shit head of yours?

I think you forgot to delete the word "brain"? Not sure what's going
on here. I think maybe the idea is that you're angry because I don't
like transparent terminals? Write back

> Next time, remove the giant throbbing horse dick out of your mouth
> before you open it. Though I know that might be difficult, what with
> your insatiable appetite for cock.

I don't normally open my mouth to type.

Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
portable by raising the hardware requirements. The only gain is
(arguably) aesthetic. This, in short, is a completely braindead idea
of no practical value, unless you tend to use a computer in the manner
of someone who has been hit very hard in the head and has forgotten
entirely what computers do and what terminals are
Received on Fri May 06 2011 - 03:46:00 CEST