Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_AT_mailplus.pl>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 16:46:27 +0200

May 2011 15:59 hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:

> For everything else on x86 you can use an old static opera (newer also
> want qt iirc).

Nope. While quite big and and packed with features, new Opera can
use plain X, and does not force cups, gtk, qt, dbus, hal etc
Received on Fri May 06 2011 - 16:46:27 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Previous message: pancake: "Re: [dev] Sup and dmc"
Maybe in reply to: Christian Neukirchen: "[dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Next in thread: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Reply: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Reply: pancake: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 06 2011 - 16:48:05 CEST