RE: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Wolf Tivy <wolf_AT_tivy.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 16:25:43 -0700

> i really like dillo because it is fast, but i would really like to
> control it like surf ...
>
> so i would propose to use neither fltk nor gtk for a dillo gui.

Agree. However, I think you still need some kind of widget
madnes for html forms.

Too bad most of the web requires javasuck these days,
otherwise dillo would be king.

/wolf
Received on Tue May 10 2011 - 01:25:43 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Slark: "[dev] [st] Mouse usage in Vim"
Previous message: dtk: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Maybe in reply to: Christian Neukirchen: "[dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Next in thread: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Reply: hiro: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 10 2011 - 01:36:02 CEST