Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: Uriel <>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:00:09 +0200

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Yoshi Rokuko <> wrote:
> +---------------------------------------------------- hiro -----------+
>> About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
>> to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because
>> of C++ or are there other reasons I've overseen?
> i really like dillo because it is fast, but i would really like to
> control it like surf ...
> so i would propose to use neither fltk nor gtk for a dillo gui.

Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits, it
took them forever and a very considerable rewrite to switch from GTK
to fltk.

Netsurf on the other hand already has quite a few different frontends
using various toolkits.

Received on Thu May 12 2011 - 20:00:09 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 12 2011 - 20:12:03 CEST