On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell
<suckless_AT_benizi.com> wrote:
> Why would you escape the asterisks here? It's not looking for literal
> asterisks.
Oops, you wouldn't. But, knowing the output format of history, I'd
change the asterisks to \+, which does require escaping in sed, which
is the half of the thought that found its way onto the page.
--Andrew Hills
Received on Fri May 20 2011 - 20:56:20 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 20 2011 - 21:00:05 CEST