Re: [dev] Distribution

From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:34:12 +0100

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:50:25 +0200
Pierre Chapuis <catwell_AT_archlinux.us> wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:01:54 +0100, garbeam wrote:
> > On 3 June 2011 12:41, Sir Cyrus <sircyrus_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
> >
> > http://bellard.org/jslinux/
>
> So the most suckless Linux is a Linux that requires a
> bloated Javascript VM to run?

Considering the emulator gets about 30 or 40 BogoMIPS, the Linux on top must be VERY computationally lightweight if it's going to give the appearance of responding at all. If I remember the numbers correctly, this works out about equivalent to a 10 KILO-Hertz 4086. :D I could be wrong, it could be more like 100kHz, but still...
Received on Mon Jun 06 2011 - 17:34:12 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 06 2011 - 17:36:03 CEST