Re: [dev] PATCH for/back navigation with xprop

From: Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:14:05 +0100

Hey,

On 6 June 2011 23:28, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I'm a little bit.. scared of perfectly decent things being cut out in the name of sucklessness to be honest.

It's quite a difficult decision to make, I think. With some tools,
like terminals, if they don't appear instantly it gets quite
irritating. A strcmp isn't going to change things, but it's best to
strip out all you can. But clearly Jon finds this behaviour useful...

(Straying from the topic a little,)

The trouble is, 'suckless' is a slippery pyramid, and it's difficult
to find the apex. The question we need to ask ourselves is, how do we
make this nicer to use than a similar tool? Only for very bloated
programs is the answer just "make it do less". We need to add
something else, too: dwm isn't great because it does less, it's great
for its dynamic tiling and its tags.

Trouble is, finding that something else is difficult.

cls
Received on Tue Jun 07 2011 - 02:14:05 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 07 2011 - 02:24:02 CEST