Bogdan Ionuț a écrit :
> > > I can bet that it's uselessgap patch related.
> > Indeed.
> > Is there a rock solid version of that patch floating around?
> Try the patch attached.
In fact, I'm using this vesion.
To fix the aforementioned problem I had to change this line:
unsigned int gap = c->isfloating ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? gappx : 0;
to:
unsigned int gap = (c->isfloating || !c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->arrange) ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? gappx : 0;
Received on Tue Sep 06 2011 - 11:29:03 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 06 2011 - 11:36:02 CEST