Re: [dev] [dwm] adding docking support

From: Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:12:56 -0400

On 10/16/11, Peter John Hartman <> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:13:03PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Anselm R Garbe <>
>> wrote:
>> > Do we really agree that touch interfaces do suck less?
>
> I think there's a category error or something here. Touch interfaces,
> indeed, entire touch-driven devices exist. Such hardware might suck
> less or it might suck more (probably the latter). But, granted the
> existence of such hardware, the real question is: which software that
> runs it sucks less? Presumably, the software we write will suck less
> than the going alternatives.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> sic dicit magister P
> University of Toronto / Fordham University
> Collins Hall B06; Office Hours TF10-12
>
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys E0DBD3D6
>
>
setting aside the idiotic and arbitrary differentiation between a
'touch interface' and any other mouse-only interface, we shold write
separate touch/mouse software instead of feature-creeping such things
into keyboard-focused programs like dwm.

-- 
# Kurt H Maier
Received on Sun Oct 16 2011 - 19:12:56 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Oct 16 2011 - 19:24:03 CEST