Re: [dev] Introducing SEE, the Simple Executing Engine

From: Pierre Chapuis <>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:01:13 +0200

It's a detail, but shouldn't simple_interrupter.c be called
simple_interpreter.c instead?

Otherwise, I haven't spent so much time looking at it but
the code looks pretty readable. The number of LOCs is
artificially high because of the C coding style, but the
complexity is low.
Received on Sun Oct 23 2011 - 16:01:13 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Oct 23 2011 - 16:12:03 CEST