Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter_AT_plaetinck.be>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:39:37 +0100

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:11:28 +0100
Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> 3. Quality: the project must aim to be a quality finished product once
> exceeding the 1.0 version number and be maintained afterwards.
> Unmaintained projects will be removed after a grace period of one
> year.

those kind of version numbers are usually pretty arbitrary. why not just use date based versions,
and call it beta software as long as it doesn't meet the appropriate criteria.

Dieter
Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 12:39:37 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 31 2011 - 12:48:06 CET