Re: [dev] [dwm] 2000 SLOC

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:35:19 +0000

On 31 October 2011 12:27, Krnk Ktz <> wrote:
> What should be done about ii? Are there features requests? I mean, it is a
> great concept and works very well as it is, doesn't it?

It works well, but the source could do with a little cleaning up.
There are some weird things, like fprintf(stderr, "%s", ...), no
forward declarations, very few comments, for some reason it doesn't
use stdio so has no buffering, etc.

Received on Mon Oct 31 2011 - 13:35:19 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 31 2011 - 13:48:02 CET