Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment

From: Seth Hover <seth.hover_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:03:26 -0800

totally; just speaking in terms of suckless projects hosted on suckless.org.
there basically IS a suckless DE. you just have to assemble it (much like
the fact that most suckless tools are meant to be compiled by the user).

apologies if this topquotes, I'm on a cell phone.
On Nov 9, 2011 4:53 PM, "Sime Ramov" <s_AT_ramov.com> wrote:
>
> * Seth Hover <seth.hover_AT_gmail.com> [2011-11-09 15:37-0800]:
> > i don't know about you but running dwm + dmenu is about as close to a
> > suckless DE as it gets (st and surf if you need the whole gamut, and I
> > use st).
>
> As is OpenBSD, nvi, herbstluftwm, xxxterm and urxvtd. See the issue now?
> Everybody has its own preferred stack, which is why this 'proposal'
> doesn't make any sense.
>
Received on Thu Nov 10 2011 - 02:03:26 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 10 2011 - 02:12:02 CET