Re: [dev] [dwm] ncol layout

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:28:55 +0100

On 31 October 2011 19:12, Jeremy Jackins <jeremyjackins_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> So in other words, if we can say tha majority use cases are:
>>
>> nmaster: 1-2
>> ncol (slave cols): 1-2
>
> Hm, so are we no longer considering bstack? I agree that mod-shift-t
> would be a nice way to do nmaster=2, but this means that with more
> than two windows I'm stuck a stack on the side and I've lost
> horizontal screen space on my small netbook screen.

No it doesn't mean bstack is not considered. I just try to collect the
opinions and to make some reasoning out of this discussion, see also
my previous email in this thread.

Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Tue Nov 01 2011 - 11:28:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Nov 01 2011 - 11:36:05 CET