Re: [dev] [dwm] ncol layout

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:28:55 +0100

On 31 October 2011 19:12, Jeremy Jackins <> wrote:
>> So in other words, if we can say tha majority use cases are:
>> nmaster: 1-2
>> ncol (slave cols): 1-2
> Hm, so are we no longer considering bstack? I agree that mod-shift-t
> would be a nice way to do nmaster=2, but this means that with more
> than two windows I'm stuck a stack on the side and I've lost
> horizontal screen space on my small netbook screen.

No it doesn't mean bstack is not considered. I just try to collect the
opinions and to make some reasoning out of this discussion, see also
my previous email in this thread.

Received on Tue Nov 01 2011 - 11:28:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Nov 01 2011 - 11:36:05 CET