Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Kurt H Maier <khm-suckless_AT_intma.in>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:29:35 -0500

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> I don't think, that checking if the tool has access to the password instead of assuming this by its effective user is distribution specific.

It isn't. Using setgid shadow is.
Received on Mon Jan 23 2012 - 15:29:35 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Stummvoll: "Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check"
Previous message: Michael Stummvoll: "Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check"
In reply to: Michael Stummvoll: "Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check"
Next in thread: Michael Stummvoll: "Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check"
Reply: Michael Stummvoll: "Re: [dev] [slock] patch for avoiding hardcoded root-check"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jan 23 2012 - 15:36:04 CET