Troels Henriksen <athas_AT_sigkill.dk> wrote:
> ii performs some strange processing around JOIN messages, which means
> that they are not handled correctly (they are put in the server buffer
> with 'null' channel name). The following patch fixes that, but I can't
> believe the code was in there for no reason, as it seems rather
> deliberate. Could someone shed some light on this?
>
Just talked to you on #suckless, but for the reast of the ML, here's the
patch that nion gave me. Not sure why it hasn't been pushed.
-emg
Received on Wed Jan 25 2012 - 23:20:42 CET