[dev] Re: obase - Sta.li moving forward?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:53:07 +0200

Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> writes:

> At the moment I have some issues with that the binaries refuse to be
> 100% static

The "musl" branch now properly builds static by default.
Use bmake CC=musl-gcc when building the musl branch.

-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen_AT_gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

Received on Tue Jun 05 2012 - 19:53:07 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jens Staal: "Re: [dev] Re: obase - Sta.li moving forward?"
Previous message: Luis Anaya: "Re: [dev] dwm window outline during mouse resize/move patch"
In reply to: Jens Staal: "[dev] obase - Sta.li moving forward?"
Next in thread: Jens Staal: "Re: [dev] Re: obase - Sta.li moving forward?"
Reply: Jens Staal: "Re: [dev] Re: obase - Sta.li moving forward?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 05 2012 - 20:00:08 CEST