On 15 July 2012 18:54, Andreas Wagner <andreasbwagner_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations of
> redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also
> improves on correctness.
>
> Check this out: http://cr.yp.to/redo.html
>
> I like redo, but I do think it should have been implemented in C from the
> start.
I agree. Redo is much nicer than make or mk conceptually, but I don't
think Python tools are very nice -- ^C and you've suddenly got stack
trace all over you. I'd be very interested in a C implementation,
actually.
cls
Received on Sun Jul 15 2012 - 22:08:56 CEST