Re: Regarding "dogma" words [Was: Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re:[dev] Build system: redo]]

From: Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:58:35 +0200

Greetings.

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:58:35 +0200 Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM, hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > people like inventing words. so what?
>
> I'm not against inventing words... On the contrary a language must evolve...
>
>
> But I'm against using a quasi meaningless word as an answer
> without also providing a meaningful or coherent argument sustaining
> it. Thus just to keep in the context of "suckless", if someone says:
> >> Project blah is not "suckless".
> I just ignore that statement on the basis of trolling...
>
> But if on the contrary he says:
> >> Project blah is not "suckless" because << insert at least an
> intent to explain why >>.
>
> Then I agree to the usage of the word, and I don't count it as dogmatism.

Who the fuck are you? And who the fuck told you it’s cool to troll on
this mailinglist?

Suckless is fanatism to its grounds. This fanatism can be expressed in
every language.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann
Received on Sat Aug 11 2012 - 00:58:35 CEST