Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:22:57AM +0200, Harry wrote:
> Don't be too hard on the posts - at least they contain comments...
>
> which is more than can be said about the coding.
>
> "Not suckless" is a double negative - do they write code that way?
>
> Someone says they don't have to give a "because" to call something
> "not suckless" (i.e. "it sucks").
>
> Is this the debut of a new "if-less" programming language? (GIGO)
>
> Btw - another word for "elitist" is "prima donna" aka "snob", depending on
> the form in which it expressed.
>
>
> Looking forward to more custurd pies being thrown.
>
> Harry
>
where are these idiots coming from? this list didn't used to have the
endless self-congratulatory navel-gazing
Received on Sat Aug 11 2012 - 05:04:52 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Aug 11 2012 - 05:12:03 CEST