Re: [dev] [surf] adblocking

From: Yoshi Rokuko <yoshi_AT_rokuko.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:13:06 +0100

------- Kurt H Maier on Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:47:46 -0500 -------
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:42:34PM +0000, Nick wrote:
> >
> > What I meant is that privoxy will strip out e.g. <img
> > src="badthing.png"> from the HTML it delivers to the browser, so the
> > browser will not request it. I think it does the same with scripts
> > etc.
> >
>
> So that makes more sense. It seems to have the same effect as
> urlfilter.ini (that is: "do not make requests to the following url
> patterns..."), but why bother generalizing this out from the browser?

somehow you guys still haven't convinced me of not using a local
/etc/hosts with all these 0.0.0.0 goat.cx in it.
Received on Wed Nov 21 2012 - 22:13:06 CET