Re: [dev] [suckless] Migration to git

From: Kurt H Maier <khm-suckless_AT_intma.in>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:54:51 -0500

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:38:17AM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> One could argue that hg doesn't fit the suckless philosophy

The git source tree is more than four hundred percent bigger than the
mercurial source tree. git ships more than 160 *man pages*. It is the
emacs of version control. There is no way in hell that hg is not
"suckless" compared to git. The fact that it is written in python is
unfortunate, but I am positive that writing a mercurial client in C
would be infinitely more beneficial than migrating every suckless
repository to fucking git.
Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 16:54:51 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Nov 26 2012 - 17:00:09 CET