Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:18:39 +0100

the reason why fossil is not suckless is:

  - database is sqlite (i doubt it can scale as much as git)
  - there's an embedded webserver with bugtracker and todo management.

but yeah, a part from that fossil is nice, but there's little userbase and
i doubt there are transition tools to convert a repo from/to fossil. git
is much more widespread.

On 11/30/12 12:02, sramov_AT_fastmail.fm wrote:
> $ pkg_info -L fossil
> Information for inst:fossil-1.24v0
>
> Files:
> /usr/local/bin/fossil
>
> $ ldd `which fossil`
> /usr/local/bin/fossil:
> Start End Type Open Ref GrpRef Name
> 00001a507ab00000 00001a507afea000 exe 1 0 0
> /usr/local/bin/fossil
> 00001a528aace000 00001a528af85000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.20.0
> 00001a527fc91000 00001a52800a6000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/lib/libz.so.4.1
> 00001a527f835000 00001a527fc91000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/lib/libssl.so.19.0
> 00001a5280bc1000 00001a528117b000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.21.0
> 00001a52849f8000 00001a5284ee0000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/lib/libc.so.66.0
> 00001a5282f00000 00001a5282f00000 rtld 0 1 0
> /usr/libexec/ld.so
>
> $ ls -l `which fossil`
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 930K Nov 21 14:26 /usr/local/bin/fossil*
>
>
> Yup, one self-contained binary.
>
Received on Fri Nov 30 2012 - 12:18:39 CET