Re: [dev] Re: [9base][awk] printf and utf-8

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Chris Down <chris_AT_regentmarkets.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:09:56 +0800

Whilst we're at it why don't we just always return 0, for better
performance...

On 22 January 2013 22:08, Sam Watkins <sam_AT_nipl.net> wrote:

> anyway, I say stick with counting bytes, for better performance!
>
Received on Wed Jan 23 2013 - 03:09:56 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: wilhelm schuster: "[dev] [st] Selection bug after using tmux mode-mouse"
Previous message: Noah Birnel: "Re: [dev] Re: [9base][awk] printf and utf-8"
In reply to: Sam Watkins: "Re: [dev] Re: [9base][awk] printf and utf-8"
Next in thread: David Dufberg Tøttrup: "Re: [dev] [9base][awk] printf and utf-8"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jan 23 2013 - 03:12:07 CET