Re: [dev] [suckless] Migration to git

From: Wolfgang Sanyer <ezzieyguywuf_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:02:49 -0500

My mother was actually not pleased when she used git. She liked the idea of
a suck less frontend though.

Wolfgang
On Feb 12, 2013 6:57 PM, "Jens Nyberg" <jens.nyberg_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> 2013/2/13 Chris Down <chris_AT_chrisdown.name>:
> > Care to give some examples of where git sucks more than hg? I've found it
> > particularly un-sucky, but non-intuitive in places.
> >
>
> People who can not grasp git thinks it's bad, it's that simple. Irony
> of it all is that it is actually a very simple design that is both
> fast, reliable and annoyingly easy to work with. Sure we could cope
> without all that syntactic sugar (a suckless frontend anyone?) but
> that is not the fault in design but simply the tools which has way to
> much options in order to please everyone and their mother.
>
> > On 13 February 2013 07:28, Sam Watkins <sam_AT_nipl.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> >> > I am proposing a migration of all mercurial to git repositories.
> >>
> >> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> >> and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software
> >> I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky...
> >>
> >> You migrated from hg to git, because *git* sucks less??? Say WHAT?!
> >>
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 13 2013 - 01:02:49 CET