Re: [dev] [st] windows port?

From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:45:48 -0400

Kill yourself.
On Apr 11, 2013 12:42 PM, "Max DeLiso" <maxdeliso_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 11, 2013 11:54 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:48:11 +0200 Max DeLiso <maxdeliso_AT_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I know what you're probably thinking.
> > >
> > > A) That's stupid
> >
> > Windows is the reason why we lack behind in software development by more
> > than 20 years. Software is unusable, proprietary and programmers are
> > taught that things should be that way and only because Redmond created
> > this environment.
>
> If windows was totally unusable would it have succeeded in the way that it
> has? Windows is certainly not ideal in any sense but you can't deny its
> ongoing success commercially.
>
> >
> > Apple and Google are creating the next backstep by binding developer re‐
> > sources in complete separate environments.
>
> What does this even mean? I could try to tease some sense out of it but
> I'll leave that burden to you...
>
> >
> > All people spreading Windows should be laughed at and sent back to
> > school for learning some real job. The same applies for people spreading
> > Google or Apple. People spreading the web should be shot, because they
> > are the reason for the next 10 years of technological standstill.
>
> The web is the future of computing, that much is evident. You can hole
> yourself up in your little imaginary world where users don't matter, nobody
> actually gets paid, and the sole criteria for judging software systems lies
> in their strict adherence to a bunch vaguely articulated idealist
> principles. I'll be out here in the real world, with the rest of the sane
> people.
>
Received on Thu Apr 11 2013 - 18:45:48 CEST