Re: [dev] ii IPv6 support

From: William Giokas <>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:32:43 -0500

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:25:25AM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
> On 2013-04-11 21:17, Carlos Torres wrote:
> > it was there just a little hidden
> >
> i mean in the ii repo ->

I agree...I think they should be put into separate branches. It would
make rebasing to a newer version ridiculously easy for end users, and
managing patches easy as well.

I currently do something similar with dwm, I have a branch 'pristine'
that tracks origin/master, and a multitude of other branches for
different patches with one that I selectively merge to called 'patched'
that I use for building. There's no reason to keep patches as patch
files in git.

William Giokas | KaiSforza
GnuPG Key: 0x73CD09CF
Fingerprint: F73F 50EF BBE2 9846 8306  E6B8 6902 06D8 73CD 09CF

Received on Fri Apr 12 2013 - 03:32:43 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Apr 12 2013 - 03:36:10 CEST