Re: [dev] mail clients

From: Michael Stevens <mstevens_AT_etla.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:17:29 +0100

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:18:50PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote:
> * Andrew Hills <ahills_AT_ednos.net> [10.06.2013 19:20]:
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens <mstevens_AT_etla.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck?
> >
> > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck.
>
> In case you don't instantly see this in Claws and didn't look into the header, he uses Mutt!
>
> So _AT_ op, what do you not like about Mutt?

mutt actually does suck less than a lot of things.

I was mostly going on feeling - mutt seems complicated and
insufficiently command line.

Michael
Received on Tue Jun 11 2013 - 12:17:29 CEST