Re: [dev] (s)werc and the suckless.org homepage

From: Andrew Gwozdziewycz <web_AT_apgwoz.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:07:18 -0400

I really don't give a shit.

The real question is why is FastCGI "suckless" approved. It's a pretty
shitty and complicated protocol for what it does, especially when compared
to SCGI.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey_AT_gmail.com>wrote:

> _who gives a shit_
>
> For a site with 50 pages, fcgi is nothing.
>
>
>
> On 11 June 2013 11:59, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <web_AT_apgwoz.com> wrote:
> > But how often does stuff actually get updated? You can simply pregenerate
> > all the content and serve it... For a site with 50 pages, that's nothing.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:36 AM, hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> For example because people didn't want to worry about having to update
> >> stuff that gets included on multiple pages.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://apgwoz.com
>
>


-- 
http://apgwoz.com
Received on Tue Jun 11 2013 - 18:07:18 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 11 2013 - 18:12:05 CEST